Bodh Narain Jha v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2294 of 2015 =========================================================== Bodh Narain Jha son of Sri Vishwambhar Jha, resident of Village - Haripur, P.O - Labour, P.S- Singhwara, District - Darbhanga, presently posted as Professor and Head University, Department of Chemistry, B.R.A. Bihar University, Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Director, Higher Education, Human Resources Department Government of Bihar, Patna.
4. The Authorized Officer, Education (P.V.C) Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
5. The B.R. Ambedkar Bihar University, through its Registrar, Muzaffarpur.
6. The Vice Chancellor, B.R. Ambedkar Bihar University, Muzaffarpur.
7. The Finance Officer, B.R Ambedkar Bihar University, Muzaffarpur. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satish Chandra Jha-3 For the Respondent State: Mr. Amaresh Kumar Sinha, AC to GA9 For the University : Mr. Mrigank Mauli Mr. Saaket Kumar Mr. Kumar Nikhil =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 06-05-2015 Let the petitioner move the Hon`ble Justice S N Jha Committee for his so-called omission to consider the material and evidence which was produced before the Committee, which led to passing of so-called erroneous order. The Committee will be the best Judge to decide whether such a stand taken by the petitioner is correct or incorrect. Writ application is disposed of with above liberty. I.A. No. 3304 of 2015 is allowed with an observation that the previous order for payment of cost to the extent of Rs.4000/- passed on 23.3.2015 is
Patna High Court CWJC No.2294 of 2015 dt.06-05-2015 2 / 2 modified that the cost will now be payable to the extent of Rs.1000/- only because the Court is only partially satisfied with the explanation. The above amount, however, can be recovered from the person so held to be responsible. (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) R.K.Pathak/- U