← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/1223/2017withdrawn

Bindeshwari Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2025-09-04Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh,Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1223 of 2017 In Letters Patent Appeal No.660 of 2014 ====================================================== Bindeshwari Prasad Singh S/o Late Chulhan Singh, resident of Plot No. V/527, Middle Income Group, P.S. Kankarbagh, P.O. Lohiyanagar, District - Patna, State - Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

Principal Secretary, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Government of Bihar, Patna 3.

The Chairman, Bihar State Housing Board, Patna, 6, Sardar Patel Marg, Patna 800015 4.

The Managing Director, Bihar State Housing Board, Patna,6, Sardar Patel Marg, Patna 800015 5.

The District Magistrate, Patna 6.

The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna 7.

The Estate Officer, Bihar State Housing Board, Patna,6, Sardar Patel Marg, Patna 800015 8.

The Revenue Officer, Bihar State Housing Board, Patna,6, Sardar Patel Marg, Patna 800015 9.

The Executive Engineer, Patna Division - 1, Lohiyanagar, Bihar State Housing Board, Patna 800020 10.

The Officer - in - Charge Patrakar Nagar, Patna 11.

Sri Dinesh Kumar, S/o Late Sitaram Das, Resident of Yogipur Math, P.S. Patrakar Nagar, Town - Patna, District - Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Suresh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Yogendra Prasad Sinha , AAG-7 For the Housing Board :

Ms. Binita Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH) 04-09-2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order dated 22.09.2016 passed in L.P.A. No. 660 of 2014 has

Patna High Court MJC No.1223 of 2017(5) dt.04-09-2025 2/2 already been complied with and he does not want to pursue the present application.

2. In view of the aforesaid, the present contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

(Sudhir Singh, J) ( Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Suruchi/Rajesh/- U