Sita Devi @ Rita Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.57433 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -405 Year- 2018 Thana -MUZAFFARPUR SADAR DistrictMUZAFFARPUR ====================================================== Sita Devi @ Rita Devi W/o Harendra Singh, R/o Vill.- Gobarsahi Dumari, Ganga Nagar, Gali No. 1, Post-Dumri, P.S.- Sadar, District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gyanendra Kumar Shukla, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Binod Kumar 3, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 08-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in Sadar P.S. Case No. 405/2018, registered for the offences punishable under Section 304(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the accused persons is committing murder of informant's daughter on account of non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

It has been submitted that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner is mother-in-law of the deceased. She is old lady suffering from various diseases. In fact deceased died on account of head injury due to falling from the bed.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57433 of 2018 (2) dt.08-10-2018 2/2 Petitioner is in custody since 13.06.2018.

Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 405/2018, subject to the conditions:

(1.) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2.) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and her absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel her bail bonds.

(3.) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Vinita/- U T