Nitish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55197 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-64 Year-2025 Thana- PARSABAZAR District- Patna ====================================================== Nitish Kumar S/O Late Hari Narayan Rai R/O Village-Kamarji, PSGaurichak, Distt- Patna, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Anirudh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Zainul Abedin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Parsa Bazar P.S. Case No. 64/2025 dated 10.02.2025 registered for the offence punishable u/s 309(6) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, three unknown miscreants ridden on the motorcycle are alleged to have snatched Rs. 2,000/- from the pocket of the informant. Further, the miscreants assaulted the informant with the butt of the pistol, causing head injury. Thereafter, nearby people assembled there then the miscreants fled away leaving the motorcycle.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55197 of 2025(2) dt.10-11-2025 2/3
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner has sprung up in the confessional statement of the co-accused persons, Abhishek Kumar and Rajeev Kumar. As per para. 147 of the case diary, the injury is simple in nature. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The other co-accused person has already been granted bail by this court vide order dated 06.05.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 29495/2025. The petitioner has three antecedents as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 05.04.2025.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner. At the instance of the petitioner, one country-made pistol was recovered from the house of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Patna in connection with Parsa Bazar P.S. Case No.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55197 of 2025(2) dt.10-11-2025 3/3 64/2025, with the condition:- (i). The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bonds of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) atul/- U T