Md. Shahid v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8705 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-666 Year-2020 Thana- MAHUA District- Vaishali ====================================================== MD. SHAHID, Son of Mohammad Tauhid Ansari, Resident of Village and P.O. Mirzanagar, P.S. - Mahua, Distt. - Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Kanhaiya Kishore, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 29-06-2021 Let the defects be removed within a period of four weeks after start of the physical Court.

The matter has been taken up through virtual Court proceeding.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498(A), 323, 376, 511/34 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

The informant has levelled allegation under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code against her in-laws including the husband. She has further alleged that the petitioner, who is younger brother of the husband, allegedly attempted to ravish her.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8705 of 2021(2) dt.29-06-2021 2/2 Learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer for bail.

Considering the background of allegation and completion of investigation of the case, let the petitioner, above named, who has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 21.11.2020, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Mahua Police Station Case No. 666 of 2020, subject to the following conditions:- (a) The petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the learned court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. (b) Both the bailors shall be resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below.

(c) The petitioner shall not leave the country without permission of the learned trial court.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Kundan/- U T