Anant Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49020 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-286 Year-2019 Thana- GARKHA District- Saran ====================================================== ANANT KUMAR Son of Meghnath Rai Resident of Village- Jilkabad, P.S.- Garkha, District- Saran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shashi Shekhar Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Kumar Veerendra Narayan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 27-09-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Garkha P.S. Case No. 286 of 2019 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 447, 504 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of Arms Act.

Informant in his fardbeyan has stated that on 22.05.2019 at 9.30 AM due to previous dispute, FIR named accused including petitioner came to his house variously armed and started abusing. Allegation against petitioner is of firing from pistol which caused firearm injury on the thigh of Poonam Devi. There is case and counter case. Petitioner's side also suffered injury for which a separate FIR has been instituted.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49020 of 2019(3) dt.27-09-2019 2/2 It has been submitted on behalf of petitioner that the injury is simple in nature. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 23.05.2019.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 14th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra, in connection with Garkha P.S. Case No. 286 of 2019 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T