Ajay Kumar Singh And ANR v. Raj Kishore Singh And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16841 of 2013 ======================================================

1. Ajay Kumar Singh Son Of Rameqbal Singh (Deceased)

2. Parsuram Singh Son Of Kamla Singh (Deceased) both Resident Of Village - Pahlezpur, Pragna Barai, P.O. Laxmiganj, P.S. Goriya Kothi, Distt. Siwan. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. Raj Kishore Singh Son of Late Raghunath Singh.

2. Bijay Kumar Singh S/O Late Raghunath Singh

3. Brij Kishore Singh S/O Late Raghunath Singh

4. Prahlad Singh

5. Praduman Singh

6. Radhey Shayam Singh all Sons Of Late Sheojee Singh all Resident Of Village - Pahlezpur, Pragna Barai, P.O. Laxmiganj, P.S. Goriya Kothi, Distt. Siwan

7. Baikunth Singh Son Of Late Jamuna Singh

8. Prabhunath Singh Son Of Late Kamla Singh both Resident Of Village - Pahlezpur, Pragna Barai, P.O. Laxmiganj, P.S. Goriya Kothi, Distt. Siwan.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sudhir Ranjan, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. NATH ORAL ORDER 14-02-2017 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioners even after repeated calls.

The present application has been filed questioning the legal acceptability of the impugned order by which the learned court below has allowed the prayer of the defendants for amendment in the written statement.

Patna High Court CWJC No.16841 of 2013 (3) dt.14-02-2017 It transpires from the perusal of the impugned order that the plaintiffs have not filed any objection to the prayer for amendment made on behalf of the petitioner. However, the learned court below after considering the facts and circumstances, has allowed the prayer for amendment after imposing the cost. As nobody appears on behalf of the petitioners, the present application is dismissed as not pressed. (V. Nath, J) Devendra/- U