Alok Kumar Singh @ Alok Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.52331 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -34 Year- 2016 Thana -TARIYANI CHOWK District- SHEOHAR ====================================================== Alok Kumar Singh @ Alok Kumar, Son of Kameshwar Prasad Singh, resident of village - Narwara, P.S. Tariyani, District - Sheohar .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Anzarul Haque Sahara, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER 16-12-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Petitioner is languishing in custody since 21.08.2016 in connection with Tariyani P.S. Case No. 34/16 for offences punishable under Section 387 of the Indian Penal Code.
The allegation against the petitioner is of demand of ransom of Rs. 2 lakhs from the informant. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he is innocent, not named in the First Information Report and has been remanded in another case i.e. Tariyani P.S. Case No. 31/15 on his inculpatory self extra judicial confessional statement. It is submitted that he has no
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52331 of 2016 (2) dt.16-12-2016 2/3 connection with the mobile used for demand of ransom and charge-sheet has already been submitted, hence, there is no chance of tampering with the prosecution evidence. It is further submitted that another co-accused, on similar allegation, has since been granted the privilege of bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 51034 of 2016 on 28.11.2016.
However, learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.
Be that as it may, since charge-sheet has already been submitted and other co-accused, on similar allegation, has since been granted the privilege of bail, let petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sheohar in connection with Tariyani P.S. Case No. 34/16, G.R. No. 136/16. This direction of bail is, however, subject to the condition that one of the bailors should be the close relative of the petitioner and the other bailor should have sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned police station/ court and that the petitioner will
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52331 of 2016 (2) dt.16-12-2016 3/3 appear before the learned court below on each and every date and failure to appear on two consecutive dates without assigning any reason will entail cancellation of his bail bonds. (Nilu Agrawal, J.) Rajesh/- U T