Birendra Singh v. The Union Of India And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1850 of 2017 ====================================================== Birendra Singh Son of Laet Prasiddhi Singh, Resident of Village- Barej, P.O.- Kauriram, P.S.- Mohaniya, District- Kaimur at Bhabua. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The Union Of India and Ors 2.
The Deputy Secretary, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Govt. of India, New Delhi.
3.
The National Highways Authority of India through its Chairman-cumSecretary, Ministry of Shipping R 4.
The Project Director, National Highway Authority, Sasaram, Bihar. 5.
The District Land Acquisition Officer-cum-Competent Authority, Kaimur at Bhabua.
6.
The Additional Collector-cum-Arbitration, Kaimur at Bhabua. 7.
The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabua. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
None For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Raj Kishore Roy- Gp18 For NHAI :
Mr. Maurya vijay Chandra, Adv.
Mr. Gaurav Govinda, Adv.
Ms. Preety Ranjan, Adv.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 24-06-2025 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner though State is present.
2. for setting aside the order dated 4.4.2015 passed in Misc. Case No. 360/2014-15 by the Additional Collector-cum-Arbitrator, Kaimur at Bhabua whereby and where under the learned Arbitrator has rejected the claim of the petitioner to calculate the value of acquired land in dispute at the rate of commercial in place of residential. And/or pass such any other order/orders which the court thinks the petitioner entitled for.
3. Learned counsel representing the NHAI submits that the arbitration has already passed an order and the petitioner could
Patna High Court CWJC No.1850 of 2017(4) dt.24-06-2025 2/2 have moved before the Competent Civil Court, if still aggrieved.
4. Though there is force in the submission of learned State Counsel, since the petitioner has not appeared, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Rajiv Roy, J) Vijay Singh/- U