Patna High CourtCR. MISC./41040/2016dismissed

Mintu Sharma @ Mintu Kumar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2016-09-29Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.41040 of 2016 Arising Out of PS. Case No. -144 Year- 2004 Thana -ARA NAGAR District- BHOJPUR ======================================================

1. Mintu Sharma @ Mintu Kumar, Son of Satyanarain Singh @ Satnarain Singh @ Satendra Singh @ Satyendra Singh

2. Nand Kishor Sharma @ Amresh Sharma, Son of Madheshwar Sharma @ Madan Sharma

3. Raj Kumar, Son of Bishundeo Singh

4. Dinesh Singh, Son of Rajdeo Singh

5. Sanjay Kumar @ Upendra Sharma, Son of Prahalad Singh

6. Bablu Kumar, Son of Baijnath Singh @ Bhola Singh All resident of village - Khapuri, P.S. Dulhin Bazar, District - Patna .... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners : Mr. Murari Prasad Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 29-09-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners are in custody since 08.08.2016 in connection with Tr. No. 688 of 2016 (G.R. No. 1126/04) arising out of Ara Nagar P.S. Case No. 144 of 2004 for the offences alleged under Sections 25(1-B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. It is submitted that petitioners had been granted bail earlier and had been well represented before the learned Court below. However, counsel for the petitioners failed to appear in the Court when the case was called out, as a result of which bail bonds of the petitioners were cancelled by the concerned Court on 08.01.2009 and thereafter process was issued under Section 83 Cr.P.C. by order dated 09.05.2016, which has led the petitioners to file the present bail petition.

4. Considering that the petitioners failed to honour the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41040 of 2016 (2) dt.29-09-2016 2/2 terms of the bail bonds and no satisfactory reason has been stated for delay of several years since the bail bonds were cancelled on 08.01.2009 for taking remedial steps, this Court is not inclined to grant the privilege of bail to the petitioners. Bail petition stands dismissed.

(Vikash Jain, J) B.T/Ibrar U T