Chandra Shekhar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12546 of 2023 ====================================================== Chandra Shekhar Singh Son of Siyaram Singh Resident of Ward No.-12, Villge-Hatwana, P.S.-Hatwana District-Supaul At Present Resident of VillageRautouli, P.S.-Pipra, District-Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
The Sub Divisional Officer, District-Supaul.
3.
The Block Development officer, Block-Pipra, District-Supaul. 4.
The Circle Officer, Pipra, District-Supaul.
5.
Ram Swarath Kamat Son of Late Sachidanand Kamat Resident of VillageRautouli, Ward no..-9, P.S.-Pipra, Distirct-Supaul. 6.
Bechan Sah Son of Samman Sah Resident of Village-Rautouli, Ward no..-9, P.S.-Pipra, Distirct-Supaul.
7.
Satwan Kamat Son of Late Jeevan Nath Kamat Resident of Village-Rautouli, Ward no..-9, P.S.-Pipra, Distirct-Supaul.
8.
Ram Kumar Kamat Son of Late Kapileshwar Kamat Resident of VillageRautouli, Ward no..-9, P.S.-Pipra, Distirct-Supaul. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Shaishav Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Md. Khurshid Alam ( AAG-12 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 05-07-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1. I) For issuance of an appropriate direction, order, or writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to dispose of the representation dated 14-06-2023 as contained in Annexure- P 4 of this writ application and further by directing the Respondents no. 5 to 8 to remove the
Patna High Court CWJC No.12546 of 2023(4) dt.05-07-2024 2/2 illegal construction which they have done after encroaching the public road and land of petitioner bearing Khata no.- 65, Khesra no. 1178 / 2452, Jamabandi no.- 195, Thana no. 73 measuring 0-9- 16-0 (9 Katta 16 Dhur) situated at Village-Rautouli, Ward no.- 9, P.S.-Pipra, District- Supaul."
2.
At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, for redressal of the aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.
3.
The writ petition stands dismissed.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U