Raj Narayan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48841 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-122 Year-2018 Thana- LAUKAHI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Raj Narayan Yadav, aged about 50 years (Male), Son of Late Bindi Lal Yadav Resident of Village - Kakardov, P.S.- Laukahi, District - Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Hriday Narayan Harshit For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 30-09-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. Informant has alleged that on 16.07.2018 at 4.30 p.m., his younger brother-in-law Laxman Sah was assaulted by Raj Narayan Yadav, petitioner by iron khanti on his chest as a result of which he sustained multiple injuries. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is case and counter case and there is also land dispute between the parties. Injuries sustained by the Laxman Sah is simple in nature. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 26.05.2019.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48841 of 2019(4) dt.30-09-2019 2/2 the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Laukahi P.S. Case No. 122 of 2018 corresponding to G.R. No.993 of 2018 with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T