Jago Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55249 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-57 Year-2024 Thana- JOGBANI District- Araria ====================================================== Jago Yadav Son Of Raghunath Yadav Resident Of Village - Bishanpur Pipra, Police Station - Jogbani, District - Araria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.

YADUBIR YADAV SON OF LATE DOMO YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - BISHANPUR PIPRA, POLICE STATION - JOGBANI, DISTRICT - ARARIA ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sarvesh Kashyap, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 14-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366(A), 504, 506 and 34 of the IPC in connection with Jogabani P.S. Case No.57 of 2024.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that his daughter was sleeping in her room on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55249 of 2024(2) dt.14-08-2024 2/3 02.03.2024, further at 05:00 AM on 03.03.2024 she went missing, it is next alleged that informant came to know that the accused persons including the petitioner abducted his daughter for the purposes of marriage with Dilkhush @ Satyam Kumar, hence he went to the house of Dilkhush @ Satyam Kumar when Bisho Yadav, Savatri Devi and petitioner abused him and threatened to kill his daughter.

4. The learned counsel submits petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted petitioner is own uncle of Dilkhush @ Satyam Kumar. It is next submitted that the victim came back and her statement was recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. wherein she has not supported the case of the prosecution and is a major aged about 18 years.

5. The learned APP opposes the anticipatory bail application.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.5000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55249 of 2024(2) dt.14-08-2024 3/3 satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with Jogabani P.S. Case No.57 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Prakash Narayan U T