← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/9820/2012disposed

Surendra Singh v. Rajya Sahkari Bhumi Vikash Ban

2015-09-29Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 9820 of 2012 =========================================================== Surendra Singh Son of Late Rajdeo Singh Resident of P.O.-Dumari Bazar, P.S.- Nayagawn, District-Saran at Chapra.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. Rajya Sahkari Bhumi Vikash Bank Ltd. (Bihar & Jharkhand) Budh Marg, Patna through its Chairman.

2. The Chairman, Rajya Sahkari Bhumi Vikash Bank Ltd (Bihar & Jharkhand) Budh Marg , Patna.

3. Managing Director, Rajya Sahkari Bhumi Vikash Bank Ltd. (Bihar & Jharkhand) Budh Marg, Patna.

4. Provident Fund Commissioner, Patna.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Bank : Mr. R. K. Choudhary, Advocate.

For the Respondent No. 4 : Mr. Prashant Sinha, Advocate.

For the E.P.F.O.

: Mr. S. K. Sinha, Advocate.

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 29-09-2015 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the respondents no. 1 to 3 and respondent no. 4 are present.

The petitioner has moved for payment of CPF, gratuity, leave encashment and arrears of salary. Learned counsel for the respondent Bank submits that as per the decision of the Special Bench of this Court in the case of The Organizer, Dehri C.D. & C.M. Union Ltd. Vs. State of Bihar reported in 2014(1) PLJR 695, the present writ petition is not maintainable. However, on merits it is submitted that as per the scheme formulated by the Court, payment is being made strictly in accordance with the seniority and in terms of the said

Patna High Court CWJC No.9820 of 2012 dt.29-09-2015 2/2 scheme even the petitioner has been paid some amount. It is submitted that in future also payment in accordance with the scheme approved by the Court, without any discrimination, shall be made to the petitioner as and when the same becomes due. Learned counsel for respondent no. 4 submits that EPF amount has been paid to the petitioner.

Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed off. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar U T