Kamlesh Raut v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61327 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-13 Year-2023 Thana- SC/ST District- Siwan ====================================================== Kamlesh Raut Son Of Hiralal Raut Resident Of Village- Firozpur, Ps- Andar , Distt- Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Asgar Kasai Son Of Md. Rafique Kasai Resident Of Village- Firozpur, PsAndar , Distt- Siwan 3.

Dilshad Kasai Son Of Asgar Kasai Resident Of Village- Firozpur, PsAndar , Distt- Siwan 4.

Irshad Kasai @ Abu Kasai Son Of Asgar Kasai Resident Of VillageFirozpur, Ps- Andar , Distt- Siwan 5.

Bakhtiyar Kasai Son Of Asgar Kasai Resident Of Village- Firozpur, PsAndar , Distt- Siwan 6.

Taslim Kasai Son Of Late Md. Rafique Kasai Resident Of Village- Firozpur, Ps- Andar , Distt- Siwan 7.

Tausif Kasai Son Of Taslim Kasai Resident Of Village- Firozpur, Ps- Andar , Distt- Siwan 8.

Sanu Kasai Son Of Taslim Kasai Resident Of Village- Firozpur, Ps- Andar , Distt- Siwan ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Subodh Kumar Barnwal, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sadanand Paswan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 24-07-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State.

2. The present application has been filed seeking cancellation of the regular bail granted to Opposite Parties vide order dated 20.05.2023 passed in SC/ST Siwan Case No. 13 of 2023 registered under Sections 341/ 323/ 379/ 504/ 506/ 34 of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61327 of 2023(2) dt.24-07-2026 2/2 the I.P.C. and Sections 3(1) (r) (s) 3 (2) (va) of the SC/ST Act.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the opposite parties are alleged to have assaulted the petitioner and abused him by taking the name of his caste.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the materials available on record, this Court is of the view that the petitioner has failed to make out a case warranting cancellation of bail, hence, no ground is made out for interference with the impugned order passed by the court below.

5. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed. (Sandeep Kumar, J) tusharika/- U T