Chintu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55547 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-127 Year-2024 Thana- GAURICHAK District- Patna ====================================================== Chintu Kumar son of Sachit Prasad Village- Vishambhar Tola PS- Gourichak District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mithilesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 03-09-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 380, 457 of the IPC in connection with Gourichak P.S. Case No.127 of 2024.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case and the said case was also instituted by the instant informant alleging that his father was killed by the petitioner and other accused persons. It is next submitted that informant alleges that his father was murdered in the night of 09.03.2024, as such his grandmother came to his

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55547 of 2024(2) dt.03-09-2024 2/3 house for participating in the funeral at Vishambhar Tola, further in absence of her grandmother who resides at Yugal Tola, the thieves broke the lock of the house and committed theft of article as detailed in the FIR, thus based on suspicion the informant alleges that theft was committed by Chintu (petitioner) along with his associates who were involved in the killing of his father.

4. The learned counsel submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant based on suspicion. It is next submitted that earlier the informant had instituted Gourichak P.S. Case No.114 of 2024 under Section 302 and 34 of the IPC alleging that his father was killed by the petitioner and his associates, but then petitioner was granted the privilege of anticipatory bail in Gourichak P.S. Case No.114 of 2024, as such the instant false case came to be instituted by the informant. It is also submitted that petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the investigation to prove his innocence.

5. The learned APP opposes the anticipatory bail application.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55547 of 2024(2) dt.03-09-2024 3/3 event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M., VIth, Patna City, Patna in connection with Gourichak P.S. Case No.127 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Prakash Narayan U T