← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/11466/2024disposed

Krishna Kumar Chandra v. The Bihar State Power Holding Company Ltd.

2025-12-11Mr. Justice Ajit Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11466 of 2024 ====================================================== Krishna Kumar Chandra Son of Prithvi Chandra Shah, resident of Mohalla - Dhanauti, Rajput Nagar, P.O. - Hazipur, P.S. - Industrial Area, DistrictVaishali at Hazipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Bihar State Power Holding Company Ltd. through its Chairman, Patna. 2.

The Chief Managing Director, Bihar State Power Holding Company Limited, Patna.

3.

The General Manager (Finance and Accounts) Bihar State Power Holding Company Limited, Patna.

4.

The Senior Manager, Finance and Accounts, Bihar State Power Holding Company Limited, Patna.

5.

Accounts Officer (Pension) Bihar State, Power Holding Company Limited, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ram Hriday Prasad, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh, Advocate For the BSPHC :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER 11-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that during the pendency of the writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed and only grievance which remains is with regard to delayed interest over pension and pensionary benefits, for which the petitioner is entitled.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that liberty may be restored to file appropriate representation before

Patna High Court CWJC No.11466 of 2024(3) dt.11-12-2025 2/2 respondent No.3, The General Manager (Finance & Accounts) Bihar State Power Holding Company Ltd. Patna, with supportive documents for adjudication of his claim.

4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State has no objection to the submissions made by the petitioner.

5. Considering the submission of the parties, this Court directs the petitioner to file appropriate representation within a period of two weeks from today and on submission of such representation, the same shall be addressed by the respondent No.3 and final order shall be recorded within further period of six weeks thereafter and benefits, if any, shall be allowed in favour of the petitioner within the same time.

6. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Ajit Kumar, J) sharun/- U