Shyam Dutt Sharma And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5850 of 2017 ===========================================================
1. Shyam Dutt Sharma, son of Late Ramdeo Sharma, resident of Village- Akhini, Police Station- Nuaon, District- Kaimur.
2. Salamuddin Ansari, son of Jalaluddin Ansari, resident of Village- Amao (Barawan), District- Kaimur at Bhabhua.
3. Umesh Kumar Singh, son of Bikrama Singh, resident of Village- Pandey Bamhare, Post Office- Khasbamhara, Police Station- Mohania, District- Kaimur.
4. Vijay Prasad, son of Ramdas Prasad, Resident of Village- Belauri, Post OfficeKudee Ram, Police Station- Mohania, District- Kaimur at Bhabua.
5. Madan Mohan Pal, son of Haridwar Pal, resident of Village- Ishri, Post Office and Police Station- Durgawati, District- Kaimur. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj.
2. The District Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabhua.
3. The District Panchayat Officer, Kaimur at Bhabhua.
4. The District Accounts Officer, Kaimur at Bhabhua.
5. The Block Development Officer, Chainpur, District- Kaimur at Bhabhua.
6. The Block Development Officer Chand, District- Kaimur at Bhabhua.
7. The Block Development Officer, Bhagwanpur, District- Kaimur at Bhabhua. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Roy For the Respondent/s : Mr. SMT. ARCHANA MEENAKSHEE- GP6 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 25-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the facts of the present case are identical to the case of C.W.J.C. No. 9451 of 2013 (Brajesh Kumar Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.), the aforesaid order squarely covers the issue involved in the present case. In such view of the matter, the concerned authority is directed
Patna High Court CWJC No.5850 of 2017 dt.25-09-2018 2 /2 to examine the facts, law and prayer of the case of petitioners and if it is found that present case is squarely covered by the aforesaid case, the same benefit should also be extended to the petitioners. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ petition is disposed of.
(Shivaji Pandey, J) Vinay/Sunny AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date26.9.2018 Transmission Date NA