Md. Soharab v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.321 of 2017 In Letters Patent Appeal No.1782 of 2012 ====================================================== Md. Soharab, son of Md. Irdrish, resident of Village Desari, PO-Desari, P.S. Desari, District Vaishali.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar
2. Mr. Jitendra Srivastva, Commissioner Cum Secretary Department of Education, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Bihar, Patna.
3. Mr. M. Ram Chandrudu, the Director, Department of Primary Education, Government of Bihar New Secretariat, Bihar, Patna.
4. Mr. satyanayan Prasad, the District Education officer, Vaishlai.
5. Mr. R.N. Chaubey, the Member, District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority Vaishali.
6. Mr. Fulendra Prasad, the Secretary, District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority Vaishali.
7. Md. Mustafa Husain Mansoory, the District Program Officer (Establishment) Vaishali.
8. Momtaj Alam, the Sub-Divisional Officer, Mahua, Vaishali.
9. Anugya Kumari, the Block Development officer, Cheharakala Block, District-Vaishali.
10. Md. Shefi Alam, the Block Education Extension Officer, Cheharakala Block District Vaishali.
11. Mr. Nagendra Singh, the Panchayat Secretary Gram Panchayat Raj Mathana Cheharakala District Vaishali.
12. Mr. Vijay Bhagat, the Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Mathana Milk, Block Cheharakala, Distt- Vaishali.
13. Md. Jakir Hussain, S/o Ahamad Hussain, R/o Village-Sarai Afjal, P.0Bisanpura, P.S.- Goraul, Distt-Vaishali. ... ... Opposite Party/s
Patna High Court MJC No.321 of 2017(3) dt.20-04-2023 2/2 ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Shashi Bhushan Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Shashi Shekhar Tiwary, Adv.
======================================================= CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR) 20-04-2023 Mr. Shashi Bhushan Kumar, the learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that the order has already been complied with. He, therefore, does not press this application.
Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed as not pressed.
(Ashutosh Kumar, J) ( Harish Kumar, J) Anjani/Praveen U