Ganesh Dutt Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.954 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 1826 of 2016 ===================================== Ganesh Dutt Singh, aged about 45 years, Son of Late Ram Vilash Singh, resident of Village - Bara Basantpur, Police Station - Ara Mufassil, District - Bhojpur Ara. .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Department of Food and Consumer Protection, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Food and Consumer Protection, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The District Magistrate, Bhojpur, Ara.

4. The Sub - Divisional Officer, Sadar Ara, Bhojpur, Ara.

5. The Block Supply Officer, Sadar, Ara.

6. Jay Prakash Yadav, S/o Late Vilash Singh, R/o Village-Bar Basantpur, P.S.-Ara Muffasil, District-Bhojpur, Ara. .... .... Respondent/s ===================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. A. K. Ojha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Alok Ranja, AC to AAG-5 ===================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 03-10-2018 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

Patna High Court LPA No.954 of 2017 (5) dt.03-10-2018 2/2 appellant-original writ petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present Letters Patent Appeal with a liberty to make a representation considering the observations made by the learned Single Judge in the second last paragraph of the impugned judgment and order, dated 24.05.2016, that "however, it is observed that as and when the vacancy will be created, the respondent will respond in a proper manner". Permission is, accordingly, granted.

The present Letters Patent Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.

As and when, any representation is made, the same shall be considered in accordance with law for which we have not observed anything in favour of the appellantoriginal writ petitioner, as even the learned Single Judge has also not observed anything in favour of the appellant-original writ-petitioner while making above observation. (Mukesh R. Shah, CJ) (Ashutosh Kumar, J) Praveen-II/Shageer U