← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./52708/2022allowed

Neha Khattan @ Neha Khatun v. The State Of Bihar

2022-12-13Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52708 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-39 Year-2021 Thana- SAHODARA District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Neha Khattan @ Neha Khatun D/O Mukhtar Ahmad @ Mukhtar Miya @ Ustar Ahmad Resident Of Village- Kauwaha, P.S.- Sahoddra, District- West Champaran.

2.

Rehana Khatoon D/O Mukhtar Ahmad @ Mukhtar Miya @ Ustar Ahmad Resident Of Village- Kauwaha, P.S.- Sahoddra, District- West Champaran. 3.

Samima Khatun D/O Mukhtar Ahmad @ Mukhtar Miya @ Ustar Ahmad Resident Of Village- Kauwaha, P.S.- Sahoddra, District- West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gauri Shankar Thakur For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Usha Kumari 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 13-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 354, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 8 of the POCSO Act and Sections 3(i)(R)(s) of the SC/ST Act. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is no specific overt act against the petitioners. There is specific allegation against co-accused

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52708 of 2022(2) dt.13-12-2022 2/2 Ibran Miya. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioners. He further submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Sahodra P.S. Case No. 39 of 2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T