Patna High CourtCR. MISC./12548/2015bail granted

Subodh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2015-05-18Mr. Justice Hemant Kumar Srivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.12548 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -224 Year- 2014 Thana -WARSALIGANJ District- NAWADA ======================================================

1. Subodh Kumar son of Chhotan Prasad, resident of village- Murgiyachak, P.s. Warisaliganj, District- Nawada .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gauri Shankar Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ray Ballabh Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 18-05-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner is ready to deposit the amount in question without admitting the prosecution case. In view of the aforesaid facts and submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, anticipatory bail petition is allowed.

Let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Warsaliganj P.S. Case No. 224 of 2014 pending in the court of Special Judge, Electricity, Magadh Area, Gaya, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand ) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the concerned court subject to

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12548 of 2015 (2) dt.18-05-2015 2/2 the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. and further more, with conditions that within three weeks from the date of his release, he shall deposit Rs. 50000/- with the Electricity Department and shall produce receipt thereof before the trial court and after that he shall deposit the remaining amount within seven months from the date of his first deposit and shall produce receipt of the aforesaid deposit before the trial court. It is made clear that failure on the part of the petitioner shall give liberty to the concerned court to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) M.Rahman/- U T