Ashok Kumar Shahi v. B.R.Ambedker Bihar University And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3078 of 2015 ===========================================================
1. Ashok Kumar Shahi, son of Late Brij Mangal Prasad Shahi, resident of villageBaruraj, District Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. B.R.Ambedker Bihar University, Muzaffarpur through the Registrar.
2. The Registrar, B.R. Ambedkar, Bihar University, Muzaffarpur
3. Vice - Chancellor B.R. Ambedkar, Bihar University, Muzaffarpur
4. Principal, Ram Briksha Mahila College, Muzaffarpur.
5. State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Vikash Bhawan, Patna.
.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Gautam For the Respondent/s : Mr. SC31-PANDEY S.SAHAY Mr. Vikas Ratan Bharti.
=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 18-05-2015 Heard counsel for the petitioner, counsel for the State and counsel for the University.
2. Taking into consideration that the matter in relation to the petitioner was considered and disposed of by a Bench of this Court in a batch of writ applications, a copy of which is annexed by the State themselves as Annexure-A to the counter affidavit, the Court rejects the stand taken by the State authorities in their counter affidavit. The 3-Members Committee's recommendation in light of the above fact is binding upon the State authorities unless they decide to challenge the said order.
3. The Court is satisfied that a direction is required to be issued upon the respondent State authorities, especially the Principal Secretary, Education, Government of Bihar, that they will take steps for implementation of the
Patna High Court CWJC No.3078 of 2015 dt.18-05-2015 2 / 2 recommendation of the 3-Members Committee, contained in Annexure-2, dated 13.5.2013. So long this recommendation stands the State has no option but to implement it.
4. Let a decision be taken on the issue within a period of ten weeks from the date of production of a copy of this order.
5. Writ application is disposed of with above direction. (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) R.K.Pathak/- U