Ravi Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52609 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-46 Year-2025 Thana- BARABAR TOURIST District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Ravi Kumar S/o Sahdev Chaudhary Village - Bela, PS - Vishnuganj Barabar (Tourism), Distt. - Jehananbad, Bihar ... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Umesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party :
Mr. Aditya Narayan Singh-1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 19-11-2025 Heard Mr. Umesh Kumar, learned Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Aditya Narayan Singh-1, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Barabar (Tourism) P.S. Case No. 46 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 190, 191(2), 126(2), 115(2), 109, 74, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023.
3. On account of old enmity between the parties, the FIR named accused persons including the petitioner barged into the house of the informant and assaulted him. It is specifically alleged that co-accused Kamlesh Kumar has assaulted the informant by means of iron rod on his head, whereas the petitioner assaulted the informant by means of fasuli leading to injury over his arm. There is further allegation against other
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52609 of 2025(3) dt.19-11-2025 2/3 accused persons of causing assault to the informant and other family members.
4. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submitted that the entire prosecution case falls on the ground for the simple reason that the informant has sustained only one injury that too was found to be lacerated over his forehead caused by a hard and blunt object and simple in nature. In support of the aforesaid contention, the injury report has been placed on record as Annexure-2. The genesis of the occurrence is said to be old enmity and as such the false implication of the petitioner cannot be ruled out; moreover, the petitioner bears fair antecedent and undertakes that he will fully cooperate in the proceeding of the court.
5. On the other hand, learned Advocate for the State vehemently opposed the bail application.
6. Regard being had to the submissions made by the learned Advocates for the respective parties and considering the nature of allegation against the petitioner qua the injury report coupled with the fair antecedent, let the petitioner abovenamed be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, upon furnishing bail
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52609 of 2025(3) dt.19-11-2025 3/3 bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jehanabad in connection with Barabar (Tourism) P.S. Case No. 46 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, with the further condition that one of the bailors shall be the own/close family members of the petitioner. (Harish Kumar, J) Pawan/- U T