Raslal Roy v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9655 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-120 Year-2020 Thana- BABUBARHI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Raslal Roy Son Of Late Hriday Roy R/O Village- Ghonghaur, P.S.- Babubarhi, District- Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ratanakar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. CB Prasad, Addl Public Prosecutor ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-07-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the State and the informant.

The petitioner prays for grant of regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and his family members killed the deceased for non-fulfilment of dowry demand.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the father in law and the thrust of allegation of torture and harassment is on victim's husband who is already in custody. It is further submitted that the petitioner is separate in mess and business from his son and the victim. Petitioner is in custody since 19.5.2020.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9655 of 2021(2) dt.22-07-2021 2/2 Learned counsel appearing for the State and the informant oppose the prayer for bail.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner, let the petitioner, mentioned above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sessions Judge, Madhubani in Sessions Trial No. 110 of 2020/CRI case no. 827 of 2020 on the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashi/- U T