← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./53120/2025bail granted

Kundan Kumar @ Kundan Kumar Rajak v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-24Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53120 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2025 Thana- JADIA District- Supaul ====================================================== Kundan Kumar @ Kundan Kumar Rajak Son of Late Nageshwar Rajak Village- Guriya, ward no 3, PS- jadia, District -supaul ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amrit Abhijat For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Pushpa Sinha Mr.Kuldeep Kumar Mr.Dhiresh Kumar Mr.Dhiraj Mr.Jitendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 24-02-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109(1), 308(2), 352, 351(2) and 61(2) of the B.N.S.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is in custody since 30.04.2025 and in sum and substance the informant alleges that petitioner assaulted him by an iron rod causing injury on head and thereafter the wife of the petitioner assaulted the sister of the informant by an iron rod causing injury on her head.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53120 of 2025(3) dt.24-02-2026 2/2

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R., it would manifest that the petitioner is not alleged to have repeated the blow, no doubt injury suffered by the informant is on vital part of her body, but then, the injury has been opined to be simple in nature.

5. Learned A.P.P. as well as the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant opposes the bail application, but then, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant fairly submits that the injury suffered by the informant has been opined to be simple in nature.

6. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Jadia P. S. Case No.86 of 2025.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T