← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/589/2015dismissed

Jai Prakash Choudhary v. The Bihar State Financial Corporation And ORS

2015-05-18Mr. Justice Mihir Kumar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.589 of 2015 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 16186 of 2010 ====================================================== Jai Prakash Choudhary Son of Late Amichand Choudhary, resident of village- Barahat, Police Station - Barahat, District - Banka. .... .... Petitioner/Petitioner

Versus

1. The Bihar State Financial Corporation through the Managing Director, Frazer Road, Patna-1.

2. The Deputy Manager, Sanctioning Authority, Bihar State Financial Corporation, Frazer Road, Patna-1.

3. The Branch Manager, Bihar State Financial Corporation, Frazer Road, Patna-1.

4. The Deputy Manager (Legal), Bihar State Financial Corporation, Frazer Road, Patna-1.

5. The Branch Manager, Bihar State Financial Corporation, Bhagalpur.

6. The Collector, Banka.

7. Sitaram Choudhary Son of Late Amichand Choudhary, resident of Barahat, Police Station- Barahat, District- Banka. .... .... Respondents/Opp. Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajib Ranjan Jha For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Choudhary, AAG13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MIHIR KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 18-05-2015 Having regard to the very limited scope of modification of a final order disposing of the writ petition as was also held by the Apex Court in the case of State of U.P. Vs. Brahma Datt Sharma reported in AIR 1987 SC 943 this Court is not inclined to go into the question as to whether the on account of nonappearance of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court had recorded any error of record by not noticing Annexure-3 to this modification petition which was infact never placed on record in

Patna High Court MJC No.589 of 2015 (2) dt.18-05-2015 the connected writ petition.

This application is accordingly dismissed.

Nothing said in this order however shall come in the way of the petitioner in taking appropriate steps against the order passed by this Court as is permissible in law. (Mihir Kumar Jha, J) Rishi/- U