Vinod Mahto @ Binod Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.1530 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -206 Year- 2015 Thana -PAROO District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================

1. Vinod Mahto @ Binod Mahto, son of Suraj Mahto, resident of VillageChandpura Dih, P.S.- Deoriya, District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Upendra Kumar Chaubey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Mukesh Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 17-01-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Paroo P.S. Case No. 206/2015, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegedly, the petitioner caused injury by Hasuli on the neck of his wife Babita Devi and fled away and further he along with other co-accused are causing threats to the informant. Submission is of false implication and that this case has been lodged only with a view to extract money and knowing the reality the wife of the petitioner came to her in-laws house and she is residing with her children there, in the house of the petitioner, happily and she boldly denied the factum of the occurrence. In this

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1530 of 2017 (2) dt.17-01-2017 2/2 case affidavit has been filed on behalf of Babita Devi itself and as such, the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration as he is suffering in custody since 11.04.2016.

Learned A.P.P. submits that one of the bailors must be the wife of the petitioner.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, West Muzaffarpur in connection with Paroo P.S. Case No. 206/2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be the wife of the petitioner i.e., daughter of the informant of this case and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Rakhi U T