Patna High CourtCR. MISC./63601/2018bail granted

Hardev Kumar Ram @ Hardev Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2018-10-25Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.63601 of 2018 (2) dt.25-10-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.63601 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -96 Year- 2018 Thana -KARJAIN District- SUPAUL ======================================================

1. HARDEV KUMAR RAM @ HARDEV RAM S/o Bachchu Ram Resident of Village- Banili- Patti, Ward No. 4, P.S. Birpur, Distt. Supaul. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kumar Goutam For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Suresh Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 25-10-2018 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Karjain P.S. Case No. 96 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Section 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is of recovery of more than 400 litres of Nepali liquor.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been made accused in this case on the disclosure of the co-accused and nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and even he was not present at the place of occurrence and has been in judicial custody since 12.08.2018 and other accused persons, who were apprehended on spot have been enlarged on bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.63601 of 2018 (2) dt.25-10-2018 dated 06.10.2018 passed in Cr.Misc. No. 61122 of 2018. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District & Sessions Judge IInd Cum Special Judge (Excise), Supaul, in connection with Karjain P.S. Case No. 96 of 2018, subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T