Ravi Ranjan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9362 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-665 Year-2020 Thana- SASARAM NAGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== Ravi Ranjan Son of Ramesh Shah Village- Bercap, P.S.- Darihat, DistrictRohtas At Sasaram. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Babu Nandan Prasad, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 21-10-2021 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 379/411 of the Indian Penal Code.

Vide order dated 09.09.2021, the learned Registrar General was directed to seek an explanation from the officer concerned, as to how and under what circumstance bail was granted to the petitioner, albeit the bail application of the petitioner was pending before this Court for consideration. In compliance to the order dated 09.09.2021, learned C.J.M., Sasaram, Rohtas vide letter dated 22nd September, 2021, has, inter alia, stated that the bail petition was filed by the petitioner on 02.06.2021 in which, it was clearly mentioned in para-2 that his regular bail application vide B.P. No. 800/2020

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9362 of 2021(4) dt.21-10-2021 2/2 has been rejected by the learned Sessions Court and after that he had applied for regular bail before Hon'ble High Court, Patna but uptil now it has not been listed and the same has been withdrawn.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that earlier he had filed mentioning slip before this Court for withdrawal of the bail application but the same was not listed before this Court.

The learned Chief Judicial Magistrate has granted bail to the petitioner on the ground of liberty granted by the learned Sessions Judge, Rohtas that if trial is not concluded within six weeks then the petitioner may file a fresh bail application before the learned lower court and the learned lower court may consider his prayer for bail on the basis of period of detention. In that view of the matter, this application stands disposed of.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T