Jitendra Kumar v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.10785 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -150 Year- 2012 Thana -HISUA District- NAWADA ====================================================== Jitendra Kumar, son of Rajdeo Prasad @ Rajdeo Prasad Kushwaha, Resident of village - Pirma, Police Station - Salaiya, District - Aurangabad. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Neetu Devi wife of Jitendra Kumar daughter of Lakhan Prasad resident of village - Pirma, Police Station - Salaiya, District - Aurangabad. At present residing at village - Latawar, P.S. Hisua, District Nawada. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 19-05-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the complainantopposite party no.2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Hisua P.S. Case no. 150 of 2012 registered under Sections 147, 323, 379 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the husband of the complainant (opposite party no.2) and is ready to keep the complainant (wife) with full dignity and honour.

Taking the same into consideration, let the above named petitioner be released on provisional bail, in the event of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10785 of 2015 (3) dt.19-05-2015 2/2 arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in connection with Hisua P.S. Case No. 150 of 2012, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. Learned trial Court is directed to issue notice to the complainant (opposite party no. 2) and make attempt to resolve the dispute in between the parties by taking all possible efforts. If the dispute is resolved, the Court below will confirm the provisional bail of the petitioner and, if the dispute is not resolved, the trial Court will pass the order on its own merit. Accordingly, this application is disposed of. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J.) Shail/- U T