← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./43043/2016rejected

Mantu Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2016-11-23Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.43043 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -150 Year- 2016 Thana -KAJI MUHAMMADPUR DistrictMUZAFFARPUR ======================================================

1. Mantu Kumar Singh Son of Nityanand Singh, resident of Mohalla- Arya Kumar Road, Machhua Toli, P.S.- Kadam Kuan, District- Patna, At Present residing in the house of Sankar Singh as a tenant, Gali No.-1, Ram Kishna Nagar, P.S.- Ram Krishna Nagar, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Branch Manager, Axis Bank Marripur, Muzaffarpur. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satya Prakash For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Renuka Ratnakar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 23-11-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking bail in connection with Kazi Mohammadpur P.S. Case No.150 of 2016 registered for offences under Sections 395 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is a case of Bank dacoity. In broad daylight, six persons entered into the Bank and looted a sum of Rs.47,08,631/- and fled away. The name of the petitioner has come during investigation and heavy amount has been recovered, is said to be looted money of Bank and also he has

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43043 of 2016 (3) dt.23-11-2016 made confessional statement before police of being involved in the crime.

In that view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.

The court below is directed to expedite the trial of the petitioner and conclude the same within a period of nine months from today and if the trial is not concluded within the aforesaid period of nine months, the petitioner will have a liberty to renew his prayer for bail before this Court. (Shivaji Pandey, J) Vinay/- U T