Siddhi Ray v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52374 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-173 Year-2025 Thana- DALSINGHSARAI District- Samastipur ====================================================== Siddhi Ray W/o Krisna Kanhaiya Prasad Ray Vill.- Devki Dham, PS- Biraul, District- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Dr.Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 19-08-2025 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends her arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 319(2), 111, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is a woman and the informant alleges that petitioner sold his share of land, which he received in partition in the year 1990 to one Ram Dayal Mahto.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that petitioner is daughter of the brother of the informant, as such she is niece of the informant. It

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52374 of 2025(2) dt.19-08-2025 2/2 is also submitted that father of the petitioner died in the year 1971, as such the claim of the informant that the land was partitioned in the year 1990 does not arise. It is further submitted that mere creation of jamabandi does not give rise to title. It is next submitted that informant has already filed Title Suit No. 65 of 2025, which is pending adjudication in the court of learned Sub-Judge-I, Dalshinsarai.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Dalshinsarai P.S. Case No. 173 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T