Md. Hassan @ Don @ Md. Hassan Don @ Hassan @ Hasan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63227 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-293 Year-2020 Thana- GAYA KOTWALI District- Gaya ====================================================== MD. HASSAN @ DON @ MD. HASSAN DON @ HASSAN @ HASAN Son of Md. Samim @ Mohammad Samim Resident of Mohalla- Iqbal Nagar, P.S.- Kotwali, District- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Tabish Sharfuddin For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 19-07-2022 The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 302 and 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code including Section 27 of the Arms Act, registered in connection with Kotwali P.S.case N. 293 of 2020. As per allegation, seven accused persons named in the FIR including the petitioner along with 7-8 unknown persons took away his son for taking Ganja and they committed his murder. It has been mentioned in the FIR that the present petitioner and co-accused Danish one day prior to the occurrence had come to the house of the informant and threatened to kill her son. They prior to the occurrence had also

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63227 of 2021(2) dt.19-07-2022 2/2 threatened to vacate the house occupied by the informant's son. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and co-accused Mr. Arbaz and Md. Zeeshan have either been granted anticipatory bail or regular bail by this Court.

There is specific allegation against the petitioner that one day prior to the occurrence he had threatened to kill the deceased and one day after threatening the son of the informant was killed.

The petitioner does not deserve the privilege of anticipatory bail. His prayer for anticipatory bail is hereby rejected.

Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the petitioner within the stipulated time as provided hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) HR/- U T