Patna High CourtCWJC/4376/2014disposed

Subodh Rai v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-02-19Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4376 of 2014 =========================================================== Subodh Rai S/O Eshwar Rai Resident Of Village + P.O. - Raini, Via - Dholi College, P.S. - Sakara, District - Muzaffarpur, At Present Posted As Pump Operator, Udhvah Sinchaee Yojana, At Place Raini Nimopur Minor Irrigation , Sub-Division Kalaster, District - Muzaffarpur .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. The Secretary, Minor Irrigation Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

3. The Commissioner, Minor Irrigation Department, New Secretariate, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

4. The Chief Engineer ( North) Minor, Irrigation Department, Near Hathi Chauk, Muzaffarpur

5. The Superintending Engineer,Minor Irrigation Circle, Combined Building, Muzaffarpur

6. The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Combined Building, Muzaffarpur .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. S.B.K. Mangalam Mr. Shashi Bhushan Singh For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Devendra Kr Sinha, Sr. Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 19-02-2016 Heard learned counsels for the parties.

Counsel for the petitioner is permitted to implead the District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, as party respondent no. 7. Let the petitioner file a detailed claim for regularization, which he is seeking in the present writ application before the District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, the Chairman of the Committee, relating to regularization of Class-IV employees for the offices falling under his jurisdiction. Matter can be examined not only in terms of the history

Patna High Court CWJC No.4376 of 2014 dt.19-02-2016 2/2 and engagement of the petitioner, but also the prevalent circulars and rules, which are applicable in such cases for consideration of regularization. The exercise must be done within four months from the date of communication / production of a copy of this order. Court has not expressed any opinion on the merit of the claim, looking at the nature of the order, so passed. Writ application stands disposed off with observation / direction as above.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) SKM/- U