Patna High CourtCR. MISC./60086/2018bail granted

Golu Kumar @ Atul Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2018-10-10Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.60086 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-459 Year-2018 Thana- BIHTA District- Patna ====================================================== Golu Kumar @ Atul Kumar S/o Dhananjay Kumar @ Dhananjay Sharma, R/o Vill.- Jinpura, P.S.- Bihta, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Akhauri Kamal Kishore Sahay, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 10-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in Bihta P.S. Case No. 459 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. Allegation against the petitioner is of recovery of one loaded country made pistol and two live cartridges. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has been implicated in this case on suspicion. Petitioner is a student. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 19.05.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.60086 of 2018(2) dt.10-10-2018 2/2 Judicial Magistrate, Danapur, Patna in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 459 of 2018, with following conditions:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U