← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./56663/2024bail granted

Ramesh Kumar Yadav @ Ramesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2024-08-09Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56663 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-270 Year-2023 Thana- LAUKAHI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Ramesh Kumar Yadav @ Ramesh Yadav, Son Of Hareram Yadav R/VVillage- Jatahi, P.S.- Khutauna, Distt.- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ratnakar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Meena Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 09-08-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272 and 273 of the I.P.C. and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that inadvertently at Para-3, it has been recorded that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent, when he has antecedent of four cases for which a supplementary affidavit has been filed. It is next submitted that the allegation is of recovery of 468 litres of liquor from a car.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56663 of 2024(2) dt.09-08-2024 2/3 petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and is not the owner of the seized car and he came to be implicated based on secret information, which is the easiest way to implicate someone. Once an accused is implicated in a case relating to excise, the police starts implicating mechanically either at the instance of Chaukidar, local people, secret information or confessional statement without holding a proper inquiry.

5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Excise Act, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani in connection with G.R. No.759 of 2023 arising out of Laukahi P. S. Case No.270 of 2023, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

7. The application stands allowed.

8. It is made clear that the learned trial Court before

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56663 of 2024(2) dt.09-08-2024 3/3 accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event, if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more than four cases, in that event, the present anticipatory bail order shall not be given effect to.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T