Ramvilash Rajvanshi @ Ramvilash Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51727 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-306 Year-2025 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Nawada ====================================================== Ramvilash Rajvanshi @ Ramvilash Ram S/o Karu Ram @ Karu Rajvanshi R/o Village- Laxman Nagar, P.S- Akbarpur, Distt.- Nawada. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sheo Nandan Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shantanu Kumar, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY ORAL ORDER 12-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the police on secret information that two persons, namely, Dinesh Rajvanshi and Ramvilash Rajvanshi (petitioner) were selling illegal liquor, conducted a raid and apprehended one person while one of them managed to flee. It is further alleged that the apprehended person disclosed his name as Dinesh Rajvanshi while the person who fled was the petitioner and on search total 20 litres of country-made wine was recovered.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51727 of 2025(2) dt.12-08-2025 2/3 petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that no incriminating article has been recovered from his conscious possession or from his house. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no concern with the seized liquor and only on account of personal differences, his name has been given. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has clean antecedent.

5. The learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the aforesaid submissions made by the parties, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Nawada Excise P.S. Case No. 306 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure read with corresponding Section 482(2) of BNSS as well as subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51727 of 2025(2) dt.12-08-2025 3/3 close relative.

(ii) The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each date of the trial.

(iii) In case of absence on two consecutive dates, or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the Court concerned.

(iv) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offence in future, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of his bail bond.

(v) The learned Court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

7. Accordingly, the prayer for bail is allowed. (Sourendra Pandey, J) Siwani/- U T