← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./50376/2025bail granted

Vikash Kumar @ Vikash Kumar Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2025-08-29Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50376 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-407 Year-2023 Thana- GAIGHAT District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Vikash Kumar @ Vikash Kumar Sah S/O Vishnudeo Sah R/O VillageBengha, P.S- Saharsa, District- Saharsa. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rakesh Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 29-08-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272, 273, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case under the Excise Act. It is next submitted that petitioner is in custody since 24.06.2025 and allegation is of recovery of 2490 bottles of 100 ml each of viscof syrup from a vehicle. It is next submitted that petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and is not the owner of the seized vehicle and he came to be implicated based on confessional

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50376 of 2025(3) dt.29-08-2025 2/2 statement of the owner of the vehicle that he had sold the vehicle to the petitioner. It is submitted that the owner of the vehicle was not able to produce any legal document to show that the vehicle was transferred in the name of the petitioner. It is further submitted that charge sheet has been submitted. It is also submitted that petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the trial to prove his innocence.

4. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Gaighat P.S. Case No.407/2023.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T