Anil Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51512 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-456 Year-2025 Thana- MAHUA District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.

Anil Sharma S/o Misrilal Sharma R/o vill-Sherpur Chhatarwara, P.S.- Mahua, District- Vaishali 2.

Sahil Kumar S/o Anil Sharma R/o vill-Sherpur Chhatarwara, P.S.- Mahua, District- Vaishali 3.

Munita Devi W/o Anil Sharma R/o vill-Sherpur Chhatarwara, P.S.- Mahua, District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the State :

Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Sachin Kumar, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 13-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case, registered for the offence under Section 80(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. As per prosecution case, daughter of informant was married to co-accused Kundan Kumar two years ago and after the marriage, she was subjected to cruelty and harassment by the accused persons for dowry and ultimately, on 09.04.2025, the informant received an information that his daughter has been killed by all the accused persons for dowry.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51512 of 2025(3) dt.13-10-2025 2/2

4. Petitioner no. 1 is father-in-law and petitioner no. 2 is brother-in-law and petitioner no. 3 is mother-in-law of the deceased. There is general and omnibus allegation. Thrust of the accusation is against husband of the deceased, who has already surrendered before the concerned Court on 23.08.2025 and since then, he is in custody. Petitioners are separate in mess and property and have got no concern with the family affairs of deceased and her husband.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant opposed the bail petition.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioners, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. - IV, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Mahua P.S. Case No. 456 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482 of the B.N.S.S., 2023. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J.) anay U T