Bhuvneshwar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.12884 of 2015 Arising out of PS.Case No. -547 Year- 2013 Thana -GAYA MUFFSIL District- GAYA ====================================================== Bhuvneshwar Yadav, S/o Shri Ram Yadav @ Shri Ram Prasad Yadav, resident of village- Chanal, Muhera, P.S.- Atari, District- Gaya. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Binod Kumar 2 (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 21-05-2015 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Moffasil P.S. Case No. 547 of 2013 for the offences instituted under Sections 406, 420, 323 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The prosecution story, in brief, is that the petitioner Bhuneshwar Yadav taking advantage of intimacy got the contact of the informant made with the other petitioners and giving bluff to get her son job in Army in lieu of payment of Rs. 3,50,000/- and on inability being shown to send her son to Saudi Arabia extorted money by different manners i.e., in cash as well as through cheques and also took Rs. 5000/- cash for getting passport of the son cleaned but when the work of the informant was not
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12884 of 2015 (3) dt.21-05-2015 2 / 3 completed and was found herself to be cheated then started to give pressure on the petitioner and others to return the money, whereupon, it is alleged, the petitioner issued two cheques of Rs. 49,000/- each but the same stood bounced when they were presented for encashment. The allegation is that then the informant made contact with the petitioner and others regarding bouncing of cheque and gave pressure to return her amount but instead of returning the amount they abused and assaulted the informant and denied to return the amount so taken.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that a vague allegation has been made in the F.I.R. against the petitioner. Further it has been submitted that other co-accused Munni Devi and Arun Kumar have been granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 12698 of 2015.
On behalf of the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from today in connection with Moffasil P.S. Case No. 547 of 2013 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12884 of 2015 (3) dt.21-05-2015 3 / 3 satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Gaya, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T