Patna High CourtCR. MISC./53118/2025bail granted

Md. Sadrul @ Sadrul Ansari @ Sadrul v. The State Of Bihar

2025-08-01Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53118 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-52 Year-2024 Thana- JOGBANI District- Araria ====================================================== Md. Sadrul @ Sadrul Ansari @ Sadrul S/O Late Jalim Miyan @ Jamaluddin R/O Village- Indra Nagar, Tikuliya Basti Ward No. 03, P.S- Jogbani, DistrictAraria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vivekanand Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Surendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 01-08-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has renewed his prayer for grant of regular bail in connection with Special N.D.P.S. Case no.130 of 2024 (arising out of Jogbani P.S. Case no.52 of 2024) registered under sections 21 and 22 of the N.D.P.S. Act.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer for bail of the petitioner has been rejected thrice including by order dated 22.11.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. no.61619 of 2024 giving liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge or on completion of one year in custody. Referring to the order dated 18.4.2025 whereby also the application for bail of the petitioner was rejected in Cr. Misc. no.22961 of 2025, learned counsel for the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53118 of 2025(2) dt.01-08-2025 2/2 submits that this Court has noted therein that charge had been framed against the petitioner in the learned trial Court. However, bail was not granted for the reason that the petitioner has not completed one year in custody. The petitioner has remained in custody for more than one year since 13.7.2024. He undertakes to cooperate in the learned Court below.

4. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.

5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations against the petitioner in the FIR, the liberty granted in the order of rejection dated 22.11.2024, the petitioner having remained in custody for more than 1 year since 13.7.2024 and charge having been framed in the learned trial Court, the Court directs the petitioner to be enlarged on bail in connection with Special N.D.P.S. Case no.130 of 2024 (arising out of Jogbani P.S. Case no.52 of 2024) on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/ (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, Araria.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Saurabh/- U T