Ranjan Kumar Patel v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.827 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2 Year-2020 Thana- KARPI District- Jehanabad ====================================================== RANJAN KUMAR PATEL S/o Chandeshwar Singh @ Ghutkun Singh R/o village- Sarmaspur Nevna, P.S.- Karpi, District- Arwal ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr.Shivendra Prasad, Advocate.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 12-03-2021 Let the defects be removed within four weeks. Heard the parties.

This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the refusal of prayer for bail vide order dated 09.11.2020 passed by the learned 1st Addl. Sessions Judge, Jehanabad in Special SC/ST P.S. Case No. 03 of 2020 arising out of Karpi P.S. Case No. 02 of 2020 registered under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The F.I.R. of the occurrence of murder of the husband of the informant was lodged after the dead body was noticed by the side of the road. The deceased was coming back to his house

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.827 of 2021(2) dt.12-03-2021 2/2 after locking the shop.

The impugned order reveals that only on the basis of mobile location, the appellant has been implicated in this case. Investigation of the case is already complete. Considering the facts aforesaid, let the appellant, above named, be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with the aforesaid case, with following conditions:

(a) Both the bailors shall be the resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned Court-below.

(b) The appellant shall fully cooperate with the trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the appellant.

(c) The appellant shall not leave the country without permission of the trial Court.

Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and the appeal is allowed.

(Birendra Kumar, J) mantreshwar/- U