Patna High CourtCR. MISC./51814/2016bail granted

Brijnandan Thakur @ Riranj Thakur @ Biranj Thakur @ Birjnandan Thakur v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2016-11-30Mr. Justice Birendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 51814 of 2016 Arising out of P.S. Case No. - 383 Year - 2003 Thana - GAYA COMPLAINT CASE District - GAYA ====================================================== Brijnandan Thakur @ Riranj Thakur @ Biranj Thakur @ Birjnandan Thakur, Son of Late Dukhan Thakur, a resident of village - Chuabar (Bahera), P.S. - Imamganj, District - Gaya .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Kiran Devi, W/o Bishundeo Thakur, a resident of Village - Mahkampur, P.S.- Dobhi, District - Gaya .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajni Kant Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Meena Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 30-11-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner is languishing in custody since 25.07.2016 in connection with Complaint Case No. 383 of 2003/Tr. No. 62 of 2016 for offences punishable under Sections 323/504 of the Indian Penal Code.

This is a case of misuse of privilege of bail for nine years. The petitioner was arrested by the police and thereafter he is in custody from 25.07.2016.

Considering the period of custody already undergone by the petitioner, he is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51814 of 2016 (2) dt.30-11-2016 2/2 Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sherghati, Gaya in connection with Complaint Case No. 383 of 2003/Tr. No. 62 of 2016 with condition that the learned court below shall be at liberty to pass necessary order ensuring petitioner's presence in the case so that the trial or further progress of the case may not hamper. If the petitioner shall not co-operate with the trial, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner and take him into custody.

Kundan (Birendra Kumar, J.) U T