Awdhesh Ravidas v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52243 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-38 Year-2025 Thana- SHEIKHOPUR SARAI DistrictSheikhpura ====================================================== 1.

AWDHESH RAVIDAS S/o- Kaleshwar Ravidas @ Kaleshar Ravidas Resident of Village- Pahariya Police Station- Shekhopursarai DistrictSheikhpura 2.

Roushan Kumar S/o- Awdhesh Ravidas Resident of Village- Pahariya Police Station- Shekhopursarai District-Sheikhpura ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Nilendu Kumar Choudhary For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Jharkhandi Upadhyay ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners seek bail in a case registered for offence under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. As per F.I.R., these petitioners and other co-accused persons named in the F.I.R. committed the murder of son of informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that deceased was son-in-law of petitioner no. 1 and his daughter was married four years ago. The wife of deceased and children were living in the house of petitioners. He further submits that deceased was addicted to drink alcohol and was suffering from several ailments. On the date of occurrence, the deceased came

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52243 of 2025(4) dt.07-11-2025 2/2 to house of petitioners where his condition deteriorated and he died. The entire prosecution story is false and fabricated. Petitioners are having clean antecedent and are in custody since 29.05.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for bail and submits that petitioners are named in the F.I.R. with specific accusation that they along with other coaccused persons committed murder of informant's son. During course of investigation, sufficient material has been collected showing complicity of petitioners in the alleged offence.

6. Considering the nature of accusation, the prayer for bail of petitioners is rejected. However, learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay U T