← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./53193/2025bail rejected

Nasrullah Miyan @ Md. Nasurullah @ Nasurullah Miyan @ Md. Nasrullah v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-03Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53193 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-68 Year-2025 Thana- BALTHAR District- West Champaran ====================================================== Nasrullah Miyan @ Md. Nasurullah @ Nasurullah Miyan @ Md. Nasrullah S/O Rajdar Miyan @ Rajdar Siddique @ Rajdar Sidaki R/O Village- Sheikh Tola, P.S- Balthar, Distt.- West Champran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

X R/O Village- Sheikh Tola, P.S- Balthar, Distt.- West Champaran. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 03-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Balthar P.S. Case No. 68 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Sections 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 70(1), 351(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. Allegation against the accused persons including the petitioner is of commission of gang rape upon the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53193 of 2025(5) dt.03-02-2026 2/3 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that general and omnibus allegation has been made against the petitioner. No specific overt act is alleged against the petitioner. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 17.06.2025 and has no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. He further submitted that trial has already commenced two witnesses have also been examined. Learned APP for the State relied upon a decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2024 SCC OnLine SC 3539 (X. vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr.), wherein in paragraph no. 14, the Hon'ble Apex Court has held has under: "14. Ordinarily in serious offences like rape, murder, dacoity, etc., once the trial commences and the prosecution starts examining its witnesses, the Court, be it the Trial Court or the High Court should be loath in entertaining the bail application of the accused."

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as also nature and gravity of offence, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage.

7. Accordingly, the prayer for grant of bail to the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53193 of 2025(5) dt.03-02-2026 3/3 petitioner is, hereby, rejected.

8. Learned Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial. (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T