← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./62894/2021bail granted

Mukesh Kumar Singh @ Mastana v. The State Of Bihar

2022-01-28Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62894 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-210 Year-2021 Thana- RIVILGANJ District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

Mukesh Kumar Singh @ Mastana Son of Dhanjee Singh Resident of Village - Nayak Bodka Baizy, Tolla, P.s.- Ravilganj, Distt.- Saran, Bihar 2.

Rajnish Kumar Singh @ Munar Son of Manoranjan Singh Resident of Village - Nayak Bodka Baizy, Tolla, P.s.- Ravilganj, Distt.- Saran, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nand Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 28-01-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State through virtual court proceedings. The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Ravilganj P.S. Case No. 210 of 2021 instituted for the offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are in custody since 16.06.2021, are persons with clean antecedent and charge-sheet has been submitted in the case.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that allegation is of recovery of 153.90 litres of liquor from the place

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62894 of 2021(2) dt.28-01-2022 2/2 of occurrence apart from a sim and mobile as detailed in the F.I.R. and the petitioners were arrested from the spot. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case, they were a mere passer-by and came to be implicated as they came near the place of occurrence where the search was being made. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioners.

Considering the fact that the petitioners are in custody since 16.06.2021, charge-sheet has been submitted in the case and the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent, let the petitioners above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 2,000/- (Rupees Two Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Excise, Saran in connection with Ravilganj P.S. Case No. 210 of 2021. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishi/- U T