Kajal Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12415 of 2023 ====================================================== Kajal Kumari W/o Sanjeev Sahani Resident of Village- Kapurpatti, P.S.- Kalyanpur, District- Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Secretary, Integrated Child Development Service (ICDS), Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Divisional Commissioner, Darbhanga.

4.

The District Magistrate, Samastipur.

5.

The District Program Officer, ICDS, Samastipur. 6.

The Child Development Project Officer, Kalyanpur, Samastipur. 7.

The Block Development Officer, Kalyanpur, Samastipur. 8.

Debki Kumari, W/o- Shri Sanjeet Kumar Sahni, Resident of VillageKapurpatti, P.S.- Kalyanpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Prasant Pratap ( Gp 2 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 15-01-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- "1(i). For issuance of writ of certiorari for quashing the order dated 26/06/2023 passed in Anganwadi Appeal Case no. 107/2022 by the District Magistrate cum Collector, Aurangabad and the order vide memo no. 1986, Case no.

305/2019 dated 10/09/2022 passed by the District Program Officer, (ICDS) Samastipur by which the respondents authorities cancelled the selection of petitioner from the post of Angawadi Sevika

Patna High Court CWJC No.12415 of 2023(2) dt.15-01-2024 2/2 from the center no. 311 of Ward No. 15 of Gram Panchayat Rambhadrapur, Block Kalyanpur, Samastipur without appreciating the material on record in its true / proper perspective.

(ii). For issuance of writ of mandamus directing the respondents to reinstate the petitioner on the post of Anganwadi Sevika on the centre no. 311 to its original position in the nature of the petitioner."

2.

After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law including that of filing a suit before the learned Civil Court having competent jurisdiction. Liberty, so sought, is granted. 3.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U