Sukhdev Muni v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.62981 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-56 Year-2018 Thana- CHARPOKHARI District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Sukhdev Muni Son of Anand Singh @ Anand Kumar Singh Village- Rajapur, P.S.-Piro, District-Bhojpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shiv Prasad Gupta For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Anil Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 25-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Charpokhari P.S. Case No. 56 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

The FIR is registered against unknown persons, who committed theft of motorcycle.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case only on suspicion. Nothing incriminating material has been recovered from his possession. Petitioner was remanded in this case on 18.08.2018 since then he is in custody.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.62981 of 2018(2) dt.25-10-2018 2/2 the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara, in connection with Charpokhari P.S. Case No. 56 of 2018 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T