← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./52386/2025bail granted

Chandan Kumar Ram @ Chandan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-08-12Mr. Justice Sourendra Pandey3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52386 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2024 Thana- THAKRAHA District- West Champaran ====================================================== Chandan Kumar Ram @ Chandan Kumar S/O Vakil Ram R/o VillageBhawanipur, P.S.- Srinagar Pujaha, District- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sujeet Kumar, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Lalan Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY ORAL ORDER 12-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable u/s 30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, total 9 litres of illicit country-made liquor and 14 litres of foreign liquor was recovered from the motorcycle.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that no incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner and he has no concern with the alleged recovery. It is next submitted that the name of the petitioner was disclosed by

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52386 of 2025(2) dt.12-08-2025 2/3 the apprehended co-accused person. It is also submitted that the petitioner is not the owner of the said vehicle. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the petitioner has clean antecedent, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, West Champaran, in connection with Thakraha P.S. Case No. 86 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharitya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.S.), with further condition/s:- (i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the Court below, if so required by the learned Trial Court.

(iii) In case of absence on two consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bonds of the petitioner will be liable to be canceled by the Court concerned.

(iv) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offence in future, the prosecution

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52386 of 2025(2) dt.12-08-2025 3/3 will be at liberty to move for cancellation of his bail bond.

(v) The learned Court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of the same or in the name of verification.

7. This application stands allowed.

(Sourendra Pandey, J) Jyoti/- U T